Arminian Today

A Gospel Centered Arminian Blog

Why A Steady Diet of Topical Preaching Is Unhelpful

Topical preaching dominates the Church in the United States.  Granted, I have not visited every church in the United States but according to one poll I read, the number of churches that preach expository sermons has dropped significantly over the past several years as the culture moves more and more toward a narcissistic focus.  Bible teachers are simply trying to keep people in the churches and so they have embraced the desire to entertain the crowds rather than teach them the Bible.

The Bible teacher is to do one thing: teach the Bible.  1 Timothy 3:2 says that the elders must be able to teach.  Paul told Timothy in 2 Timothy 2:2 to teach other faithful men so that they in turn can teach others.  Discipleship is to be a teacher teaching a student who in turn learns from the teacher and teaches others the doctrines of the faith as well as how to live the life of a disciple of Jesus (Matthew 28:19-20).  The Bible teachers job is not to entertain but to explain Scripture.  We are to take the Word of God and seek to exegete it accurately so that the original teaching is given as best we can before God.  Our job is not to make people laugh with our stories or jokes or to move them with our illustrations.  Our job is to teach the Bible and to feed them the Word of God (Hebrews 6:1-3).  Babies need milk (1 Peter 2:1-3) but the mature need meat (Hebrews 5:11-14).

Topical preaching is more like a steady diet of fast food.  It takes great but is not good for you.  McDonald’s will make you happy and it does taste good but a steady flow of McDonald’s is not good for you.  You need healthy substance to survive.  Fast food makes one fat and lazy.  Granted, there is nothing wrong with a hamburger from McDonald’s from time to time but it should not be our diet.  Yet this is just what the modern church seems to be doing.  A steady diet of fast food Christianity that tastes good but is not producing healthy disciples.  Fast food Christianity produces shallow, self-focused people who want their felt needs met and view God as an end to their own problems.  Lost is the holiness of God, the hatred for sin, the passion for God in prayer, the hunger for the Word of God, a zeal for evangelism, a passion to have a biblical worldview and to be as godly as one can be in a sinful world.  Instead, fast food churches produce people who believe being a Christian simply involves saying a “sinner’s prayer” and then their life consists of man-centered, man-focused routines that have little to do with the Lord Jesus.  They join a club, not a kingdom.

Expository preaching produces strong disciples.  How so you ask?

1.  Expository preaching teaches people how to study the Bible.

2.  Expository preaching teaches people how to study and then apply doctrine to their lives (1 Timothy 4:16).

3.  Expository preaching focuses on the Word of God and not the opinions of men.

4.  Expository preaching forces the Bible teacher to teach the text rather than just proof text.

5.  Expository preaching doesn’t avoid controversial aspects of our society or theology.

6.  Expository preaching unites the doctrines of Scripture together to show how they relate and exalt Christ.

7.  Expository preaching focuses the attention in the Church upon Christ and not people.

8.  Expository preaching requires the Bible teacher to spend much time reading and praying over the text.

9.  Expository preaching will elevate the thinking of the people unlike topical preaching which just reinforces views.

So why do most churches avoid expository preaching?  I would answer that by saying that 1) many churches want to entertain to draw crowds which equals money and success in their view and 2) the preacher is simply spiritually lazy and will not take time to study the Word of God to teach the Word as it should be honored and taught.  In turn, topical preaching doesn’t teach the Word of God but is simply the preacher picking what he wants to say, makes his points, and then proof texts his points.  That is not teaching the Bible.  That is your teaching backed up by proof texts from the Bible.  Expository preaching preaches the Bible and allows the text to speak for itself.

I pray earnestly for a return to expository preaching!  Even among house churches, expository teaching should be the norm.

About these ads

Written by The Seeking Disciple

02/08/2013 at 10:00 AM

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Amen brother. I have said this for years. Consequently, most of the professing christians (lower case “c” on purpose) look exactly like the world in every way.

    Rj Sauvageau

    02/08/2013 at 1:08 PM

  2. I totally agree. Topical Preaching is also the dominant way of preaching in Europe and it’s robbing the church of the power od the whole Word of God. Topics change as the seasons change, but the meat and the milk from expository preaching keeps the church strong.

    JNj.

    02/09/2013 at 1:14 AM

  3. [...] I read this over here on this blog.  Though I am not endorsing everything that is written on that blog, I really thought this was a very good article to encourage us with the importance of expository preaching.  I personally did a lot of topical preaching at the beginning of my ministry. In the last several years, I have transitioned to almost exclusively doing expository preaching, and I agree that it is a much better way to preach the Word of God.  It provides an endless supply of material.  It takes the focus off of the preacher and puts it more on God and what He wants to say.  It builds people’s confidence in the Word of God.  It prevents soap-boxing and disciplines you to teach the whole counsel of God.  It produces real growth in the preacher and the people. [...]

  4. This may not be popular here, but I want to offer a third way.

    Many years ago, as churches agonized over the “hymns versus choruses” debate, the late Robert Weber introduced the term “blended worship;” a mixture of classic and modern compositions.

    I believe there is some merit in bringing that mindset to this topic. I don’t necessarily lean to either the topical or expository style of preaching, as I believe there is only good preaching and bad preaching. The problem with topical preaching is that you never get deep enough into the context of the passage to learn anything new; it tends to have a guilty-by-association link with weak or entry-level teaching. The problem with expository preaching is that you miss the beauty and majesty of how the whole of scripture fits together, how the Bible speaks to various themes, and how seemingly contrasting verses hold a particular issue in tension.

    So a blended approach would involve the use of related passages, but with a particular key passage more fully exegeted. None of this approach negates any of the nine points above, but it avoids the mindset that I’ve seen exist among some who are steeped in the expository approach and seem to have a phobia about introducing cross-references or parallel passages.

  5. [...] But every once in awhile I run across an article that is waving the flag for the expository style, and therefore reiterating an implied disdain for the alternative, topical preaching; like this one last week at Arminian Today. [...]


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 571 other followers

%d bloggers like this: